The police officer charged with murder following the fatal shooting of Chris Kaba will be publicly named on January 30 next year.
Judge Lucraft said that the officer’s name and date of birth will be made public next year, but that their home address or any image of them cannot be published.
In his ruling, the judge said he had viewed ‘raw underlying intelligence material’ before coming to the conclusion there was not a ‘real and immediate risk’ to the life of the defendant or to his family.
In the immediate aftermath of the shooting in September 2022, he said there was ‘significant information about a threat’.
Chris Kaba died when he was shot through the windscreen of a car in Streatham Hill, south-east London, on September 6 last year
Recorder of London Mark Lucraft KC ruled today that the Metropolitan Police marksman who shot Mr Kaba (pictured) will be identified after legal hearings at the Old Bailey last month
However, any risks in lifting the anonymity order could be addressed in various way to ‘ameliorate or mitigate them’, he said.
He went on: ‘If NX121 is named, there is a risk that some may seek to obtain more details about him and to make threats to him or his family.
‘However, in my judgment the naming the defendant or in giving his date of birth does not give rise to a real and immediate risk to his life.
‘In contrast, in my judgment the lifting of all aspects of his identity might give rise to such risks and so the order of this court will not permit the address of the defendant to be given in court.
‘Secondly, the order will continue to prohibit any photographs, drawing, image or detailed description to be reported for the same reason as the address.’
On the three-month delay, Judge Lucraft said: ‘Not only should that period of time cater for consideration of any pre-trial issues but it should also cater for the imposition of any additional mitigating measures to be put in place or implemented by those responsible for dealing with NX121 before the first name or names, surname and date of birth of NX121 are able to be released.
‘As any trial will not be before the summer of 2024, I do not see that this should cause any other concerns.’
Mr Kaba, 24, died when he was shot through the windscreen of a car in Streatham Hill, south-east London, on September 6 last year.
The Metropolitan Police marksman was charged with murder on September 20 this year, with the Crown Prosecution Service choosing not to publicly name the officer at that stage ahead of an application to keep him anonymous.
He appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court the following day, where District Judge Nina Tempia put an order in place banning publication of anything that would identify the officer, ahead of further legal hearings at the Old Bailey.
Mr Kaba, 24, died when he was shot through the windscreen of a car in Streatham Hill, south-east London, on September 6 last year, sparking protests across London (pictured)
A plea and trial preparation hearing is due to take place on December 1, with a trial potentially starting on September 9 next year.
Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said in a statement: ‘I recognise that for officers this decision will be hugely concerning, and that the impact of this and recent cases is felt right across armed policing and beyond.
‘The Met has supported the anonymity hearing by providing evidence and factual information to His Honour Judge Lucraft KC to assist him in making a decision.
‘We take seriously the Open Justice principle, however it was important to make the court aware of the effect that loss of anonymity would have in this case.
‘We acknowledge the judgment by the court and note the detailed and careful consideration that has taken place.’
Members of Mr Kaba’s family sat in court as Judge Lucraft made his ruling.
Afterwards, they issued a statement thanking the court for ‘working in the public interest of open justice’.
They said: ‘We must be allowed to know the name of the man who shot and killed our much loved son, brother and fiance.
‘We hope the court will now be allowed to do its job without further disruption or delay.’